Paulson Provides A Prozac Moment

I just might be starting to buy into all of this depression talk.

Not a Depression, of course. With apologies to George Soros and John Whitehead, that idea remains ludicrous. I’m talking just plain depression. It’s hard enough when your job has you knee-deep in the muck every day, and when the Dow has a ‘7’ handle, and when your friends want to talk markets first, sports second. But then piled on top is that, after having convinced enough people that the original idea was a good one (the only one?), the guy steering the bailout ship, and one of the few public faces of crisis-solution in which some of us had any faith, essentially says it’s time to start over.

Now that’s depressing.

My first reaction to Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson’s reversal was actually one of admiration; I wanted to give him some props for being flexible, for moving with the markets. And he is in a tough spot, after all. 

But six seconds later it hit me—wasn’t TARP supposed to be THE plan. Remember how hard Paulson sold TARP? (Perhaps better dubbed now the Capital Restoration Asset Program; at least it’s a more appropriate acronym). And I liked TARP at the time, if for no other reason than Nancy Pelosi didn’t, and because I couldn’t come up with anything better myself.

But now, it seems that the very assets Treasury had its eyes on for rescue are basically accepted to be worthless. At the same time, a shift to get more nonbank names involved, those without heretofore dreaded counter-party risk, seems to be underway. These are two developments that fly in the face of the urgent, almost panicked request to get TARP going in the first place.

Remember, the scheme to buy up the toxic debt from Street banks wasn’t billed as a small part of the plan … it WAS the plan, and Paulson told us we needed it. Now! Upon reflection, I’m left wondering if the Treasury secretary 1) knows what he’s doing, or, worse, 2) felt enough heat from the politicians about giving money to greedy banks that he was compelled to cave into their desire to share it with consumers, who also happen to be known as voters.

For that he would surely deserve our scorn.

Recent Posts

Investors Win Warner Chilcott Battle, But Expect a War

Investors this week pushed back on Warner Chilcott’s attempt to reduce pricing on its $1.95 billion term loan B, but most don’t believe the market’s repricing fight is over...

Bad Buyouts and What We Could Do about Them

Allied Stores. Burlington Industries. Charter Medical. E-H Holdings. Federated Department Stores… These companies are among the 13 that, between 1985 and 1989, issued a billion or more in junk bonds to help fund a buyout—then promptly went bankrupt...

A Repeat of 2009 Returns? Not. But No Disasters Either

As we here at Leveraged Finance News join you in saying goodbye to 2009 and looking ahead at the year to come, two little words spring to mind: do over? Maybe not all of it, but certainly returns...

Cha-Ching! High Yield Brings High Bonuses

While returns in the 40% to 50% range portend a 2009 Grinch-free holiday season for most leveraged loan and high yield bond professionals, those dedicated to selling and trading junk bonds are on track to receive the highest bonuses...

Index of Posts

5 Comments

The site content is OK, very good, very interesting. By the way electronic products class article? I would like to take a second look!ZOPO?ZP200

Posted by: qing h | May 24, 2012 10:39 PM


china wholesale.This article gave me great inspiration, is very good, welcome more people can see this article and help to you newfreeshipping.com

Posted by: qing h | May 24, 2012 10:38 PM


Your nice article, thank you for sharing.At the same time, recommend to you xxx at newfreeshipping.com Window N90 Tablet

Posted by: new f | March 27, 2012 9:35 PM


It is nice that you posted something like this USB Microscope and I am quite lucky to read it. Thanks for posting this!

Posted by: guo h | March 25, 2012 9:23 PM


It is nice that you posted something like this USB Digital TV Tuner and I am quite lucky to read it. Thanks for posting this!

Posted by: guo h | March 25, 2012 9:23 PM